|
|
The MD Ohio Environmental Update
Edited
by Sarah J. Staley Environmental
l Toxic
Tort l
Litigation
To Our Clients and
Friends,
McMahon DeGulis LLP is pleased to bring you our
monthly Ohio Environmental Update. This Update features
important state and federal cases, statutory and regulatory changes, and
policy initiatives affecting environmental law in Ohio. New links will be posted
throughout the month on our related blog. Please visit our blog at
www.mdohioenvironmentalupdate.blogspot.com.
We hope you find the Update interesting and helpful, and we would be grateful for any feedback you might have. Thank you.
Federal Court Cases: Kentucky Oil and Refining v. W.E.L., No. 7:09-148 (E.D. Ky March 8, 2010). The Court granted a
preliminary injunction ordering Kentucky Oil to clean up waste on its
property, holding that W.E.L. had a substantial likelihood of success on
its RCRA claim. As part of
its evaluation, the Court stated that W.E.L. need not demonstrate that the
waste in question originated with Kentucky Oil, but rather, that the waste
was now on Kentucky Oil’s property and presents an imminent and
substantial endangerment to health or the environment.
State Cases: Ohio Power Siting Board approves first large wind farms in Ohio. McMahon DeGulis LLP
attorney Dave Nash represented JW Great Lakes Wind Farm before the Ohio
Power Siting Board. The farm
received its approval on March 22, 2010. Located in Hardin County, the farm
will span over 3,400 acres and will include between 19 and 27 wind
turbines with a total capacity of 50MW.
Sierra Club v.
Jones, No. 255633 (ERAC March 17,
2010) In order to determine
whether a permit to install expired at a heat recovery metallurgical coke
plant, ERAC sought to determine whether the plant was undergoing a
continuing program to install.
ERAC held that for such a program to exist, the company seeking a
continuation of the PTI must bring forth more than just contracts
associated with the physical construction of a
facility. Salem v. Korleski, No. 09AP-620 (Ohio App. Dist. 10 March 23, 2010). In order to be
eligible to receive an NPDES permit, the applicant need not provide 30
days of data regarding total dissolved solids. Concomitant evidence would be
sufficient. Statutory and Regulatory
Changes: As part of the
changes, Ohio EPA would remove the definition for “non-point source” and
would allow for thermal mixing zones in state lakes and waters that are
designated as exceptional warmwater habitats and coldwater habitats. Comments on the proposed rule are
due April 26, 2010.
Policy Initiatives: Ohio EPA issues new guidance regarding the 10 tons/year exemption for BAT. In light of
Sierra Club v. Korleski, Ohio EPA intends to evaluate new and
modified sources on a case-by-case basis (without the applying of the
previously-used exemption). Ohio Department of Development announces new Brownfield Revolving Loan Fund. Local governments and
nonprofits may apply for grants of up to $200,000. Applications are due by April 9,
2010.
Ohio EPA comments on US EPA’s proposal to strengthen its ozone standard. Ohio EPA focused on
the accomplishments Ohio has already made and the difficulty of meeting a
more stringent standard.
Ohio EPA comments on the federal GHG Tailoring Rule. While Ohio EPA
supports limiting GHGs, Ohio EPA would prefer legislation on the issue
rather than regulation of GHGs through the Clean Air
Act. News: Ohio EPA issues Covenant Not to Sue to Steelyard Commons. McMahon DeGulis LLP
attorneys, Suzanne Fisher and Dave Nash, represented Steelyard Commons
through the VAP process.
Ohio EPA issued the
announcement on March 2, 2010.
To unsubscribe from our Update, please email us at envlaw@mdllp.net. |
|
Cleveland
Columbus
McMahon DeGulis's Update is published to provide information to our clients and friends. Information in this news brief should not be used as a substitute for specific legal advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice. |